Legal Opinion
Montana Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 29, 1963No. Civ. No. 206PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), F.R. Civ.P. The relevant facts have been stipulated, and the parties in their respective briefs are in essential agreement in their statements of fact. The issues arise in the conclusions to be drawn from these facts and supporting documents.
Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to two United States Government oil and gas leases covering lands in Fal*216Ion County, Montana.1 *These leases are a consolidation of four oil and gas prospecting* permits issued between December, 1926, and February, 1928,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hudspeth v. SchmelzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Smith v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Fey v. A. A. Oil Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1955
- Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anne Windfohr Sowell, Cross-Appellants v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Meagher County Newlan Creek Water District, Inc. v. WalterMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- Vinson Minerals, Ltd. v. XTO Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Montana Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Escondido Resources II, LLC v. Justapor Ranch, L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.