Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 20, 1996No. 94-2054PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

After an offer to confess judgment was accepted by the plaintiffs, the court conducted a hearing to determine the entitlement of interest and court costs. The court denied prejudgment interest and refused to allow the recovery of deposition costs incurred but not filed with the clerk prior to the filing of the offer to confess judgment. The plaintiffs appeal from the court’s ruling. We affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

This case arose out of a collision that occurred on March 3, 1993 between a ear owned and operated by Ginger Hughes and a train owned and operated…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coker v. Abell-Howe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Veach v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Sheer Construction, Inc. v. W. Hodgman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Barske v. Rockwell International Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Vasquez v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Scholz v. S.B. International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Des Moines Area Regional Transit Authority and United Heartland v. Arbreina YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. Rick v. SpragueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Harris v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. Purina Mills, L.L.C. v. LessDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API