Legal Opinion

Montanez v. HSBC Mortgage Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-4074-JDPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DuBOIS, District Judge.

1. INTRODUCTION

This case arises from defendants HSBC Mortgage Corporation’s (“HSBC Mortgage”) and HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc.’s (“HSBC Services”) practice of force-placing1 insurance policies on properties that secure mortgages they issued. Plaintiffs — borrowers on whose property defendants force-placed insurance — allege that the premiums on the force-placed insurance policies were unreasonably high and that defendants profited unlawfully by accepting kickbacks from insurers and purchasing unnecessary policies. Plaintiffs assert claims for breach of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Landau v. Viridian Energy PA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Vantage Learning (USA), LLC v. Edgenuity, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Haywood v. University of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Gallo v. PHH Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
  5. Conquest v. WMC Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API