Legal Opinion
Clyde Blincoe, D/B/A Instead Sky Sports v. Federal Aviation Administration
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 22, 1994No. 93-70449PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
I
Clyde Blincoe, d/b/a Instead Sky Sports, filed a claim with the Federal Aviation Administration’s San Francisco Airports District Office alleging the Airport Authority of Washoe County had discriminated against him in violation of 49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1349(a) by requiring him to carry a $1,000,000 comprehensive general liability insurance policy for his skydiving, hot air balloon repair and aerial photography business operated at the Reno Stead Airport while not requiring other tenants at the same airport to carry similar coverage. After investigating Blincoe’s allegation and seeking advice…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nevada Airlines, Inc. v. BondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Southern California Aerial Advertisers' Association v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sierra Club v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fairbanks North Star Borough v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Aerosource, Inc. v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- City of San Diego v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- City of Arcata v. SlaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Oregon Natural Desert Association v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.