Legal Opinion
City of Arcata v. Slater
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 24, 1997No. 97-71015UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
133 F.3d 926
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
CITY of Arcata, City of Eureka, the County of Humboldt,
Arcata Chamber of Commerce, the Greater Eureka
Chamber of Commerce, Ken Davlin, an
individual, and Jack Limmer,
an individual, Petitioners,
v.
Ronald E. SLATER, as Secretary of the Department of
Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Jane F.
Garvey, as Acting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern California Aerial Advertisers' Association v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sima Products Corporation, an Illinois Corporation v. Dr. John McLucas Administrator, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Mace v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- City of Alexandria v. HelmsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Robert F. BURTCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Pierre v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- City Of Pierre v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Ventura v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011