Fairbanks North Star Borough v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
The Clean Water Act (“CWA”) makes it unlawful to discharge dredged and fill material into the waters of the United States except in accord with a permitting regime jointly administered by the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). See United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc., 474 U.S. 121, 123, 106 S.Ct. 455, 88 L.Ed.2d 419 (1985). Fairbanks North Star Borough (“Fairbanks”) seeks judicial review of a Corps’ “approved jurisdictional determination,” which is a written, formal statement of the agency’s view that Fairbanks’…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Minard Run Oil Co. v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- National Pork Producers Council v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. United States Coast GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Belle Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.