Legal Opinion
Powell v. District of Columbia Housing Authority
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 2003No. 96-AA-1347PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Dollean Powell appeals the decision of the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) to terminate her eligibility for housing subsidies under the Tenant Assis tance Program (TAP) for “fraudulently” under-reporting her income in order to obtain more assistance. See 14 DCMR § 1936.1(c) (1991). Powell contends that DOHA ended her assistance despite having failed to establish all of the elements of fraud, and that its factual findings were not supported by substantial evidence. We concur with Powell that DCHA’s findings of fact were insufficient, and reverse and remand…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Aguiar v. Hawaii Housing AuthorityHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- Perkins v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Follo v. FlorindoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Mathis v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- D.C. Appleseed Center for Law & Justice, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities, & BankingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Owens v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.