Gibson v. Cline
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Defendants contend that the order appealed from does not meet the requirements of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 65(d). This contention has merit.
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 65(d), provides in pertinent part as follows: “Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order shall set forth the reasons for its issuance; shall be specific in terms; shall describe in reasonable detail, and not by reference to the complaint or other document, the act or acts enjoined or restrained;....”
This rule represents a departure from prior North Carolina practice. See 2 A. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pruitt v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Setzer v. AnnasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Pruitt v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Setzer v. AnnasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spencer v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Hopper v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Carolyn Louise Gunn Testamentary Tr. v. BumgardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- Carolyn Louise Gunn Testamentary Tr. v. BumgardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- Invue SEC. Prods., Inc. v. SteinNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017