Pruitt v. Williams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
By their first and second assignments of error, defendants contend the court erred in failing to make specific findings of fact based upon the evidence and in failing to make conclusions of law based upon the findings of fact. We find no merit in the assignments.
G.S.'lA-l, Rule 65(d), provides, among other things, that every order granting an injunction shall set forth the “reasons for its issuance”. Rule 52(a) (2) provides, among other things, that “ . . . findings of fact and conclusions of law are necessary on the granting or. denying of a preliminary injunction or any other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Dulin Ex Rel. Dulin v. FairesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Setzer v. AnnasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Automobile Dealer Resources, Inc. v. Occidental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gorhinogo, LLC v. LewisNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
- Gibson v. ClineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Myers v. H. McBride Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Bayer Cropscience Lp v. Chemtura Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2012