Legal Opinion

Setzer v. Annas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 7425SC170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant’s four assignments of error are directed to both the granting and the composition of the preliminary injunction which was entered against the defendant by the trial court. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, contending that such an appeal from a preliminary injunction is premature and fragmentary.

An appeal may be taken to this court “from every judicial order or determination of a judge of a superior court. . . which affects a substantial right [emphasis added] claimed in any action or proceeding, or which in effect determines the action, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Privette v. PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Jenkins v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Emry v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ClineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Setzer v. AnnasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API