Legal Opinion

Farr v. West

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1922No. 2406PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Walker. Warren superior court. December 30, 1920.

1Opinion of the Court

Eish, O. J.

1. “ Valuable improvements,” as used in the Civil Code (1910), § 4634, relating to specific performance of a parol, contract for the purchase of real estate, mean improvements of such character as add permanent value to the freehold, and such as would not likely be made by one not claiming the right to the possession and enjoyment of the freehold estate. Improvements of a temporary and unsubstantial character will not amount to such part performance as, when accompanied by possession alone, will take the contract out of the operation of the statute of frauds. Baucom v. Pioneer Land…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Price v. LloydUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Gordon v. SpellmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Murphy v. HohneSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Lloyd v. RedfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Baucom v. Pioneer Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mickle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Vickers v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Davis v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  4. Brittain Bros. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Wall v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API