Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Hohne
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 31, 1917PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Appeal from Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; F. M. Robles, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
The bill of Complaint herein is as follows:
“James H. Murphy, by his solicitor Hilton S. Hampton, brings this his amended bill of complaint against Emmett Hohne, and thereupon your orator complains and says: That on the 18th day of June, 1915, the defendant was seized and possessed of the following premises lying in Hillsborough County, Florida:
“Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 3 of Luna Park, as per revised map of the same recorded in the records of Hills-borough County, Florida. And desiring to sell same to the complainant, thereupon the complainant then and there agreed to pay the sum of $449.00 in…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- L'Engle v. OverstreetSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Rose v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Gaskins v. ByrdSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rundel v. GordonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Dehuy v. OsborneSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- R. E. L. McCaskill Co. v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Gautier v. BradwaySupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Dixie Naval Stores Co. v. German-American Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1918
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.