Legal Opinion · Dissent
State v. Black
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 2015No. Nos. 2013-0552 and 2013-0805Published
1DissentO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 58} Respectfully, I dissent.
{¶ 59} At issue in this case is whether the term “penal or correctional institution of a party state” in R.C. 2963.30 — Ohio’s codification of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”) — includes county jails. Unlike the majority, I do not believe that this term includes county jails. The plain language of the IAD, as codified in the statute, establishes that the term “penal or correctional institution of a party state” refers to a state penal or correctional institution.
Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 60} On August 2, 2010, in case No. 10-CRI-080, Ashland…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.