City Savings Bank v. Hopson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Actioh upon a note; brought to the Superior Court. Facts found and case reserved for advice. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.
On January 13th, 1876, the defendants Hopson, Wilmot, Clarke and Waller, for value received executed and delivered to the plaintiff their joint and several promissory .note for $20,700, payable on demand, with interest semi-annually on the first days of January and July in each year in advance. In pursuance of an agreement then made, on April 4th, 1876, the plaintiff received from Clarke and Wilmot, by way of collateral security for the note, two notes, one for $4,950, payable on demand, the other for $5,050, payable six months from date, both dated March 3d, 1876, made by the .¿Etna Spring &…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Breed v. HillhouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fegley v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
- Westminster National Bank v. GrausteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Johnson v. Charles D. Norton Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Roberts v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Delsman v. FriedlanderOregon Supreme Court · 1901
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.