Delsman v. Friedlander
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomab: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Action by Joseph Delsman against S. H. Friedlander and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant Friedlander appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wodverton
It is stated in the complaint that for value the defendants I. W. Baird and A. M. Baird, on July 19, 1893, executed to the defendant Friedlander their promissory note for $1,000, payable four months after date; that on November 20, 1893, the defendants S. H. Friedlander and John D. Wilcox, for value received, indorsed and gaurantied payment of said note, waiving demand, notice of protest, and protest thereof, and delivered the same so indorsed to this plaintiff, who is now the owner and holder thereof. The answer of Friedlander sets up a discharge by reason of plaintiff’s failure to make…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allen v. RightmereNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Breed v. HillhouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
- Hungerford v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- City Savings Bank v. HopsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Gage v. Mechanics' National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Marshall-Wells Co. v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Hendrix v. Bauhard Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Drovers' Deposit National Bank v. TichenorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Nicholson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.