Roberts v. Hawkins
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of G-rand Rapids. (Burlingame, • J.) Assumpsit, Defendant brings error. The. facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
January 12, 1884, one Lyman D. Eollett made his promissory note as follows:
“$1,000. Grand Rapids, Mich., January 12, 1884.
“ One year after date, I promise to pay to the order of Helen M. Roberts one thousand dollars, with interest at eight per cent, per annum. Value received.
“ Lyman D. Follett.”
And defendant signed an indorsement on the back thereof, as follows:
“ For value received, I hereby guarantee the payment of the within note. L. E. Hawkins.”
*567On the delivery of this note to plaintiff, she paid Follett $1,000. January 8, 1885, seven days before this note became due, Follett paid one…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- King v. BaldwinCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1819
- Pain v. PackardNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- King v. BaldwinNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Brown v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Allen v. RightmereNew York Supreme Court · 1823
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Frank Herman & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Fegley v. JenningsSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
- Noble v. Beeman-Spaulding-Woodward Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Delsman v. FriedlanderOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Miller v. Lewiston National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.