Legal Opinion
Albert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 28, 1994No. B073689PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (A. M.), P. J.
Bertrand E. Albert (Albert) appeals judgment entered against him in his action against Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SP or respondent) after the court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).)
While working for SP on March 28, 1991, Albert, then 55 years old, suffered a heart attack. He had never experienced any symptoms or been told by any physician that there was anything wrong with his heart. Until the attack, Albert felt “[vjery normal.” As a result, no one at SP had any knowledge of his heart condition.
Albe…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bernice Pierce v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Francis v. Heater v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Raymond D. Robert v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Orie W. Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Murillo v. Rite Stuff Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Sanchez v. Swinerton & Walberg Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Montgomery v. Cal Accountants Mutual Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Montgomery v. Cal Accountants Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998