Legal Opinion

Lujan v. Gordon

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1977No. Civ. 48543PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FILES, P. J.

This case raises the issue whether an action for malicious prosecution may be maintained against a person who had no part in the commencement of the action, but who participated in it at a later time. Although the cases in point are sparse, they indicate that liability may be imposed against such a person.

The appeal is from an order dismissing the action as. to two defendants only, after their general demurrer to the second amended complaint had been sustained with leave to amend, and plaintiff declined to amend. The complaint alleges in effect that on December 14, 1965, an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ray Wong v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Skopp v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Russell v. ChamberlainIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Dreux v. DomecCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. SYCAMORE RIDGE APARTMENTS LLC v. NaumannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Swat-Fame, Inc. v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Bergman v. DrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API