Brewer v. Elks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
It is provided by statute “all partners are jointly and severally liable for tihe acts and obligations of -the partnership.” G.S. 59-45. Hence the admission -of defendants Keel that they were general partners in the ¡business conducted under the name of Friendly Furniture Company, coupled with 'the testimony that Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. discounted the note of 17 February 1959 which on its face bore no evidence that it was an- obligation of tire partnership, purporting merely to be the obligation of defendants Elks and plaintiff, presents for determination this question: Did plaintiff offer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- First State Bank of Riesel v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Thomas & Howard Co. of Shelby, Inc. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- National Surety Corporation v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Lackner v. McKechneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ron Medlin Construction v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Hines v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Oxford Plastics v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Messer v. Laurel Hill AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Russell v. Bank of Kirkwood PlazaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.