East Carolina Oil Transport, Inc. v. Petroleum Fuel & Terminal Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting default judgment for defendant. The judgment entered against plaintiff does in fact state in its heading that it is a summary judgment and a default judgment. However, the wording within the body of the judgment itself only speaks in terms of a summary judgment and makes no mention of a default judgment. When it is unclear from looking at the judgment whether a default judgment or a summary judgment was intended, the wording of the body of the judgment itself controls, not the heading. The judgment entered in the case sub…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Oxford Plastics v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Meir v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Ellison v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- First Union National Bank v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. v. Key Way Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Grant v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Gallbronner v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Partridge v. Associated Cleaning Consultants & Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- JMM Plumbing & Utilities, Inc. v. Basnight Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.