Bergstresser v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Presiding Judge.
The sole issue presented in this review of an award of the Industrial Commission is whether the hearing officer abused his discretion in denying the employee’s claim for one pint of whiskey a day as supportive care pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1065.
On January 1, 1967, the appellant/employee Earl Bergstresser was injured in the course of his employment at Western Greyhound Lines, and the Industrial Commission awarded him an unscheduled permanent partial disability. The employee thereafter filed an undated petition for supportive care. This request was denied by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Valdon v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Gomez v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- State Compensation Fund v. MohrmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Franco v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Gardiner v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Ortega v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Hartford v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.