Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:
These cross-petitions for review and enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) present two significant issues, one of which we find troubling. First, we must determine whether the Board properly held that Roy-type Division, Triumph-Adler Royal, Inc. (“the Company”), predecessor in interest of petitioner Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc., committed an unfair labor practice by failing to bargain with International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agriculture Implement Workers of America, Local 376 (“the Union”) on a mandatory subject…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Company Local 1022, Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc., Olivetti Supplies Inc., Petitioners-Cross-Respondents (90-4068) v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner (90-4094), Uaw Local 376, Intervenor (90-4068). Uaw Local 376, (90-4082) v. National Labor Relations Board, Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc., Olivetti Supplies, Inc., Intervenors. National Labor Relations Board, (90-4082) v. Roytype Division, Triumph-Adler Royal Inc. And Its Successors, Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc., and Olivetti Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991