Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Attorney Doe No. 792

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 5, 2016No. 14–1987PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZAGER,. Justice.

In this attorney disciplinary action, we are asked to decide whether an attorney’s ex parte email to a judge that included allegations of, unethical conduct and a cover-up violated our Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. We find that the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board did not .prove a violation of rule 32:8.2(a). However, we do find that the Board proved a violation- of rule 32:3.5(b). The appropriate sanction for this violation is a private admonition.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Attorney Doe No. 792 passed the Iowa bar exam in 1997. He chose not to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Matthew M. BolesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth J. Weiland Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Brian Michael GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. 75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. 75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Amended January 23, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API