Legal Opinion
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Brian Michael Green
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided December 16, 2016No. 16–1551PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAGER, Justice.
The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (Board) filed a complaint charging an attorney with violations of two of our ethical rules. The attorney did not answer the complaint, and the facts of the complaint were deemed admitted pursuant to rule 36.7. See Iowa Ct. R. 36.7, After a hearing, which the attorney failed to attend, the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa (commission) found the attorney violated our ethical rules and recommended we revoke the attorney’s license. Upon our de novo review, we conclude the Board proved by a convincing preponderance…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Winnebago Industries, Inc. v. HaverlySupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Ronald L. RicklefsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael J. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric Kenyatta ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Luke D. GuthrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Sandra Esther Suarez-QuiltySupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Anthony R. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Iowa Supreme Court Att'y Disciplinary Bd. v. Curtis W. Den BesteSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.