75-80 Properties v. Rale, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
75-80 Properties, LLC et al. v. Rale, Inc. et al., No. 1689, Sept. Term, 2017. Opinion by Arthur, J. STATUTORY INTERPERTATION – EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS Md. Code (2014), § 5-859(b) of the General Provisions Article requires a member of Frederick County’s governing body who “communicates ex parte with an individual concerning a pending application during the pendency of that application” to disclose the communication. This statute requires the disclosure of any ex parte communication with an individual, regardless of whether the individual is an applicant. Even if the communication occurs…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Koste v. Town of OxfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 75-80 Properties v. RALE, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020