Franco v. Liposcience, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentErvin, Judge
Although I fully concur in the Court’s conclusion that the trial court properly denied Plaintiff’s recusal motion, I respectfully dissent from my colleagues’ determination that the trial court correctly granted a directed verdict in favor of Defendant at the close of all of the evidence. As a result, I believe that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed and that this matter should be remanded for a new trial.
A trial court evaluating a dismissal motion under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 50(a), must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and give that party…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Still v. LanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Dunlap v. BergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.