Legal Opinion

Village of Walbridge v. Carroll

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2007No. WD-06-059PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Handwork, Judge.

{¶ 1} This appeal is from the December 16, 2005 and July 27, 2006 judgments of the Wood County Court of Common Pleas, which rendered judgment in favor of appellee, the village of Walbridge. Upon consideration of the assignments of error, we affirm in part and reverse in part the decision of the lower court. Appellants, Terry and Gloria Carroll, assert the following assignments of error on appeal:

{¶ 2} “FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR: The Ullage faded to conclusively prove that the public treated the easement as a right-of-way for 21 years and therefore it was error for the trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rueckel v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Centel Cable Television Co. of Ohio, Inc. v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Murray v. LyonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Siferd v. StamborOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Broadwater Development, L.L.C. v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Queen v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Tower 10, L.L.C. v. 10 W. Broad Owner, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Broadwater Development v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Columbia Gas v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API