Pierce v. C. H. Bidwell Thresher Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Case by Loren D. Pierce against tbe C. H. Bidwell Threshing Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The defendant is engaged in the business of manufacturing and placing upon the market threshing machines. On the 20th of September, 1906, the plaintiff was injured by breaking through the decking and into the cylinder of a machine which had been manufactured by defendant and sold to one Joseph Harned in the summer of 1905. The machine was what is known as a Bidwell bean thresher. The mechanism of this machine consisted in part of a cylinder, with metal frame and teeth, situated near the top and toward the rear of the machine, and which, when the machine was in operation, revolved rapidly and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Bright v. Barnett & Record Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- O'Neill v. JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Griffin v. Jackson Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Colbert v. Holland Furnace Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
- O'Brien v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Babylon v. ScrutonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Lill v. Murphy Door Bed Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Texas Drug Co. v. CadwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.