Succession of Leonard
Supreme Court of Louisiana
\ .£\. PPEAL from the Ninth District Court, parish of Eapides. JOewis, J.
1Opinion of the CourtWyly, J.
Dennis Sullivan appeals from a judgment rejecting his demand, dismissing his opposition, and homologating the account of the administrator of William Leonard’s succession.
He claims that he is a creditor for $3035 25, evidenced by five promissory notes of the deceased, and by an open account against him; that the administrator refused to allow his claims and place them *524on Ms tableaux, and lie prays tliat tlie account be amended by placing thereon said claims to be paid according to law.
The main defense is a denial that the notes were signed by the intestate William Leonard.
This is a question…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCloskey v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Neill v. LacySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
3Cited by4 opinions
- Behan v. BallardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1884
- Serio v. TrainorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Watts v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Watts v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914