Legal Opinion

Succession of Leonard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1869No. 149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

\ .£\. PPEAL from the Ninth District Court, parish of Eapides. JOewis, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWyly, J.

Dennis Sullivan appeals from a judgment rejecting his demand, dismissing his opposition, and homologating the account of the administrator of William Leonard’s succession.

He claims that he is a creditor for $3035 25, evidenced by five promissory notes of the deceased, and by an open account against him; that the administrator refused to allow his claims and place them *524on Ms tableaux, and lie prays tliat tlie account be amended by placing thereon said claims to be paid according to law.

The main defense is a denial that the notes were signed by the intestate William Leonard.

This is a question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCloskey v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Neill v. LacySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Behan v. BallardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1884
  2. Serio v. TrainorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  3. Watts v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Watts v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API