Legal Opinion

Watts v. Collier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 29, 1914No. 20444Published

Appeal from Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Claiborne; William C. Barnette, Judge. Action by Prote Watts and another against B. T. Collier, Sheriff, and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion

On the Merits.

O’NIELL, J.

The plaintiffs, Prote Watts and his wife, Boxie Watts, have appealed from a judgment denying their claim to a homestead exemption and dissolving a writ of injunction whereby they had arrested the seizure and sale of a tract of about 7% acres of land. The seizure was made by virtue of *103a writ of fieri facias, pursuant to a judgment obtained by tile defendant, A. McOranie, on a written acknowledgment of debt and confession of judgment. The instrument is dated the 1st day of December, 1908, is for $175.06, bears interest at 8 per cent, from its date, and contains the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ball's Administratrix v. BallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  2. Temple v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  3. Huddleston v. CoyleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  4. James v. RandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  5. Robinson v. ArnetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API