Legal Opinion · Dissent

Watts v. Collier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 29, 1914No. 20444Published

Appeal from Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Claiborne; William C. Barnette, Judge. Action by Prote Watts and another against B. T. Collier, Sheriff, and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1DissentSlidell, J.

“In respect to this peculiar class of instruments, it seems to me courts, in admitting secondary evidence, should be careful to require as great an extent of testimony as can, with reasonable diligence, be obtained, the danger of forgery being so much greater in such' cases, and I may add, of error or mistake, in consequence of the illiterateness of the person purporting to be bound. It must be conceded that the proof that the subscribing witness was a man of good reputation would greatly aid in satisfying the mind. I think the tenor of our decisions and practice goes to require that extent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. CoyleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  2. Pinckard, Steele & Co. v. HamptonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
  3. Succession of LeonardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  4. Succession of WeigelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API