Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Kuykendall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1923No. 12434PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was commenced by S. J. Caldwell, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against O. L. Kuykendall, W. II. Bougher, and F. D. Venum, defendants in error, defendants below, in the district court of Grant county, Okla., for ihe purchase price of two race horses, in the sum of $2,000, sold by plaintiff to defendant F. D. Yenum, for which he executed his promissory note in the sum of $2,000, which, under written contract, was to he indorsed by O. L. Kuykendall, and the horses were delivered to defendant Yenum and the note executed to plaintiff by Venum for $2,000 and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kuykendall v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Kuykendall v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allied Building Credits, Inc. v. Grogan Builders Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Walker v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Veatch v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Veatch v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API