Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 23, 1918No. 8985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Grant County; W. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by S. J. Caldwell against O. L. Kuykendall and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Kuykendall alone brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

POPE, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Grant county on the 22d day of October, 1912, by S. J. Caldwell, the defendant in error, against the plaintiff in error 0. L. Kuyken-dall, AY. H. Bougher, and E. D. Yennum. Service of summons was had on Kuykendall only, and he alone appeared in the action. It was alleged in the petition: That the plaintiff was an old man, infirm, and unfamiliar with the technicalities of commercial law, and that the three defendants, knowing his infirmity and intending to take advantage thereof, entered into a conspiracy to cheat and defraud…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caldwell v. KuykendallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API