Legal Opinion

Michaels v. Pacific Soft Water Laundry

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1930No. Docket No. 7255Published

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, Acting P. J.

The two plaintiffs, as stockholders in the defendant laundry corporation, sued to have it declared that the sales of treasury stock of the corporation to defendants Bull and Thompson were void. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for plaintiffs as prayed. The defendants Bull, Fletcher and Craft joined with the corporation in an appeal from the judgment. The defendant Thompson prosecutes a separate-appeal. Both appeals are presented on a joint bill of exceptions.

The two plaintiffs constituted the minority of the board of directors of the laundry company.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Windram v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API