Legal Opinion
Lust v. Sealy, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 19, 2003No. 02-C-50-CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
This is a sex discrimination case brought pursuant to Title YII of the Civil Rights of Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d). Plaintiff Tracey Lust alleged that defendant Sealy, Inc. violated Title VII when it passed her over for a promotion in favor of a male. In addition, she alleged that defendant violated the Equal Pay Act by paying her less than males who performed equivalent work. In an opinion and order dated December 30, 2002, I granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part and dismissed…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vega v. Chicago Park DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Prochaska v. Menard, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2011
- Hudson v. Lands' End Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Johnson v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.