Legal Opinion
Prochaska v. Menard, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 19, 2011No. 10-cv-686-bbcPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
The question in this ■ case is whether defendant Menard, Inc. fired plaintiff Marvin Prochaska from his job as vice president of real estate because of plaintiffs age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. 29 U.S.C. § 623. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, in which it argues that no reasonable jury could find in plaintiffs favor. Dkt. # 39.' In the alternative, it argues that plaintiffs damages should be limited under the “after acquired evidence” doctrine articulated in McKennon v.…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glaus v. Speedway Superamerica, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Hudson v. Lands' End Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Nelson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Jones v. B & J Rocket America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2015
- Ahmed Mahmoud v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and Deneen Wellik, in her individual and official capacitiesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.