Legal Opinion

Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Kingsley

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBiedzell, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The defendants were members of the school board of Franklin district in Steele county. As such, they entered into a contract with the defendant Kingsley to erect a school house for the district. They took no bond for the protection of those who might supply the labor and materials, such as they were required to take by § 6832 of the Compiled Laws for 1913. The plaintiff and appellant sold Kingsley material which was used in the building, for which the latter became indebted and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. American Surety Co. v. Lawrenceville Cement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1901
  4. George H. Sampson Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. United States, ex rel. Standard Furniture Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kessler v. Board of Education of City of FessendenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kessler v. Board of Education of City of FessendenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API