Legal Opinion

George H. Sampson Co. v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1909PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Two bills in equity, filed in the Superior Court respectively on March 14, 1904, and April 18, 1907, the first by the George H. Sampson Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maine, and the second by Alfred A. Hersey of Melrose, both of them against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and also against the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, in the first case as surety on a bond…

Read the full summary

Two bills in equity, filed in the Superior Court respectively on March 14, 1904, and April 18, 1907, the first by the George H. Sampson Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maine, and the second by Alfred A. Hersey of Melrose, both of them against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and also against the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, in the first case as surety on a bond given under the requirement of Pub. Sts. c. 16, § 64, and in the second case as surety on a bond given under the…

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

The first of these suits is brought against the firm of Shanahan, Casparis and Company, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, to recover for materials furnished to the above mentioned firm in the construction of parts of an aqueduct for the supply of the city of Boston and its suburbs with water, which parts of the aqueduct the firm agreed to build under contracts entered into with the metropolitan water and sewerage board, under the provisions of the St. 1901, c. 168. The Pub. Sts. c. 16, § 64, which were in force when these contracts were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Murdock Parlor Grate Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Nash v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Andrews v. Tuttle-Smith Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Johnson-Foster Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Hoier v. KaplanIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Rowe v. Inhabitants of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API