Legal Opinion

Reclamation Dist. No. 730 v. Hershey

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1915No. Sac. No. 2141PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hudson Grant, G. Clark, and Black & Clark, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was prosecuted by plaintiff to foreclose a lien upon the lands of defendants under a reclamation district assessment imposed upon those lands. Plaintiff was given judgment and from that judgment and from the order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial defendants have appealed.

In 1907 the original plan of reclamation of this district was reported to the board of supervisors of Yolo County, was adopted and an assessment levied in conformity therewith. This assessment was contested by these appellants, and in Reclamation District v. Hershey, 160 Cal. 692, [117 Pac. 904], their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reclamation Dist. No. 673 v. DiepenbrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Reclamation Dist. No. 17 v. BonbiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Reclamation District v. HersheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Reclamation Dist. No. 535 v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Reclamation District No. 17California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Spurrier v. Reclamation District No. 17California Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API