American Cold Storage v. The City of Boonville
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentBradford, Judge
First, I would accept Boonville’s argument that the question of how the State-owned parcels should be counted has been waived. Second, I would conclude that the parcels owned by the State should be treated no differently than any other parcel for purposes of the 65% rule of the remonstrance statute. Consequently, I respectfully dissent.
I. Waiver
I would not address the Landowners’ argument regarding how the State-owned parcels should be treated because it was not raised before the first appeal. “The law is well-established that an issue is waived if it was available on the first appeal but was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Irmscher v. McCue Ex Rel. McCueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Scott v. IrmegerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rupert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Callahan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.