Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Cold Storage v. The City of Boonville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2012No. 87A01-1112-PL-610Published

1DissentBradford, Judge

First, I would accept Boonville’s argument that the question of how the State-owned parcels should be counted has been waived. Second, I would conclude that the parcels owned by the State should be treated no differently than any other parcel for purposes of the 65% rule of the remonstrance statute. Consequently, I respectfully dissent.

I. Waiver

I would not address the Landowners’ argument regarding how the State-owned parcels should be treated because it was not raised before the first appeal. “The law is well-established that an issue is waived if it was available on the first appeal but was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Irmscher v. McCue Ex Rel. McCueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Scott v. IrmegerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Rupert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Callahan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API