Scott v. Irmeger
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Jill Seott ("Scott") brings this appeal challenging the Carroll Cireuit Court's order awarding Jeremy Irmeger ("Irmeger") attorney's fees under the qualified settlement offer statute when Irmeger did not personally pay the attorney's fees. Concluding that a defendant may incur attorney's fees even though a third party pays such fees on the defendant's behalf, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History1
In September 2003, a dog allegedly attacked Scott on Irmeger's property. Scott sought compensation for her injuries in a negligence action that she filed on March 18, 2004, in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. BloomIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Harco, Inc. of Indianapolis v. Plainfield Interstate Family Dining AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Chavis v. PattonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. WillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Beeson v. ChristianIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gellenbeck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Knowledge A-Z, Inc. v. Sentry InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Worsham v. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Colen v. Ohio CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Maplehurst Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.