Legal Opinion

Rupert v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1999No. 20A04-9810-CR-514PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge

Adam Rupert appeals his conviction for child molesting, a Class B felony. 1 Rupert raises two issues on appeal, which we restate as:

I. Whether the scrotum is a “sex organ” as contemplated by Ind.Code § 35-41-1-9 (1993).

II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

We affirm.

I

Whether the Scrotum is a Sex Organ

The facts most favorable to the verdict reveal that Rupert nibbled and sucked on the scrotum of his girlfriend’s one-year-old child. Rupert contends that his conduct does not constitute child molesting under IC 35^2-4-3(a). IC 35-42-4-3(a) defines…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Indiana Department of Human Services v. FirthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Detterline v. BonaventuraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. Windy City Fireworks, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gellenbeck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. David Mathews v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Betwel Birari v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. EichorstIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Jordan Stafford v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API