Rupert v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge
Adam Rupert appeals his conviction for child molesting, a Class B felony. 1 Rupert raises two issues on appeal, which we restate as:
I. Whether the scrotum is a “sex organ” as contemplated by Ind.Code § 35-41-1-9 (1993).
II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
We affirm.
I
Whether the Scrotum is a Sex Organ
The facts most favorable to the verdict reveal that Rupert nibbled and sucked on the scrotum of his girlfriend’s one-year-old child. Rupert contends that his conduct does not constitute child molesting under IC 35^2-4-3(a). IC 35-42-4-3(a) defines…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Indiana Department of Human Services v. FirthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Detterline v. BonaventuraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Windy City Fireworks, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gellenbeck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- David Mathews v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Betwel Birari v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. EichorstIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Jordan Stafford v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.