Legal Opinion
City of New Orleans v. CharouLeau
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 22, 1908No. 16,967PublishedCited by 32 opinions
Appeal from Fifth Recorder’s Court, City of New Orleans; Fred. Deibel, Recorder. N. Charouleau was convicted of violating a city ordinance, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.
Ordinance No. 16,204 (C. S.) § 14, provides as follows:
“No cow shall be used in any dairy or dairy farm unless the same shall have undergone the tuberculin test or which is known to be suffering from tuberculosis, splenic fever, anthrax, or any local or general disease which is liable to render the milk from said cows unwholesome, and every person keej>ing a milch cow for dairy purposes shall permit it to be examined, without cost to the owner, from time to time, as to its freedom from disease, by a veterinarian designated by the health authority, nor shall any cow be brought into and sold…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Loftus v. Department of Agriculture of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Patrick v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Durand v. DysonIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Fevold v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- City of New Orleans v. SanfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.