Legal Opinion

City of New Orleans v. Sanford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 11, 1915No. 21357PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from First Recorder’s Court of New Orleans; J. J. Fogarty, Recorder. Miss M. Sanford and others were convicted of violating an ordinance of the Board of Health of the City of New Orleans, and they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

The defendants, four in number, have appealed to this court from a conviction and sentence in the First recorder’s court of the city of New Orleans for violation of Ordinance 17, as amended by Ordinance 21, of the board of health of the city of New Orleans and parish of Orleans. They were sentenced to pay- a fine of §25, or, in default of paying same, to be imprisoned for 30 days in the parish prison.

The said ordinance is the rat-proofing ordinance of the board of health. It was adopted on July 25, 1914, as a precautionary measure against the spreading of bubonic plague in the city of New…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. CharouLeauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. City of New Orleans v. SmytheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. State v. ZurichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  4. City of New Orleans v. SteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  5. State v. GaribaldiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. HerndonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  3. City of New Orleans v. CalamariSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. City of Baton Rouge v. ShilgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  5. City of New Orleans v. BeckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API