Legal Opinion

City of Terre Haute v. Pairsh

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 2008No. 84A05-0707-CV-402PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Defendants, City of Terre Haute, Engineer’s Office of the City of Terre Haute, and City of Terre Haute Street Commissioners (collectively, the City), appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in Ap-pellee-Plaintiffs, Annette Pairsh (Pairsh), personal injury action.

We reverse and remand.

ISSUE

The City raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the City is immune from liability for Pairsh’s injuries pursuant to the Indiana Tort Claims Act (ITCA), Indiana Code § 34-13-3-1 et seq.

*1205 FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Town of Highland v. ZerkelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Voit v. Allen CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Boston v. Gyn, Ltd.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Beech Grove v. Cathy J. BeloatIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of Indianapolis v. DUFFITTIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Flaherty & Collins, Inc. v. BBR-Vision I, L.P., and New Castle Realty, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Gresser v. Dow Chemical Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. The Board of Commissioners of Delaware County a/k/a Delaware County Commissioners v. Beverly J. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API