Boston v. Gyn, Ltd.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Plaintiffs, Kelly and Randall Shook (collectively, the Shooks), appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees-Defendants, Dr. James Szymanowski (Dr. Szymanowski) and GYN, Ltd., (GYN).1
We affirm.
*1189ISSUES
The Shooks raise one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Dr. Szymanowski and GYN.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts in the light most favorable to the Shooks establish that on March 13, 1991, Dr. Szymanowski performed a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Wright v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Malooley v. McIntyreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- McGee v. BonaventuraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Simms v. SchweikherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Syfu v. QuinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of Terre Haute v. PairshIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rebecca Stafford, Individually and as Surviving Parent of Drayden Powell, and Drayden Powell v. James E. Szymanowski, M.D. and Gyn, Ltd., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Flaherty & Collins, Inc. v. BBR-Vision I, L.P., and New Castle Realty, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gresser v. Dow Chemical Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.