Legal Opinion
Conkin v. Ruth
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 22, 1978No. 48851PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.
The parties own adjoining tracts of land in McIntosh County, Oklahoma. Plaintiffs Conkin filed this action for damages from defendant Ruth and injunctive relief against the continuance of (a) diversion of surface water flow, (b) a nuisance, and (c) trespassing, which are alleged to have resulted from Ruth’s construction of a service station and restaurant on his tract. Treating the case as one in equity the parties tried it to the court who, after hearing and seeing a substantial amount of evidence, granted plaintiffs a $11,750 judgment. Ruth appeals contending plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Allied Hotels, Ltd. v. BardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Keck v. BrusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Lynn v. RaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. DrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- " L" INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. LynchNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- MAPCO Alaska Petroleum, Inc. v. Central National Insurance Co. of OmahaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1991
- Truelock v. City of Del CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- MAPCO Alaska Petroleum, Inc. v. Central National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1991
- Truelock v. City of Del CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998