Legal Opinion
MAPCO Alaska Petroleum, Inc. v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided November 15, 1991No. A89-470 CivilPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
(Re Motions for Summary Judgment)
H. Russel HOLLAND, Chief Judge.
The court has before it several motions for summary judgment which require the court to interpret provisions contained in insurance policies issued to plaintiff MAP- CO Alaska Petroleum, Inc. (“MAPI”). 1 The defendant insurance companies are: Central National Insurance Company of Omaha and Protective National Insurance Company of Omaha (collectively “Central”), Pacific Employers Insurance Company (“PEIC”), and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (“USF & G”). Oral argument was heard on September 6, 1991.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. J. William OldenburgCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.