Legal Opinion

Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. Drew

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1913No. 2351PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; 8. II. Russell, Judge. Action by Byron Drew against the Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Eailroad Company for damages on account of a private nuisance. From a judgment for plaintiff for $1,995, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHAEP, C.

Among the errors urged by plaintiff in error are the following: First, that a railroad company is not liable to an abutting owner in damages on account of noise, smoke, or other like inconveniences, resulting from the operation of its trains in a lawful, careful, and proper manner; second, that a nuisance cannot arise so as to give a common-law right of action from that which the law authorizes; third, that, its right of way having been obtained pursuant to law, and compensation made for the lands taken, claims of abutting owners for consequential damages cannot be…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Terminal Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Sheridan Oil Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. City of Mangum v. Sun Set FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API