Legal Opinion

Opperud v. Twedell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1935No. 23719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced in the district court of Kay county, Okla., July 8, 1929, by M. L. Opperud, plaintiff in error herein, against “ Laura A. Endieott Twedell and Thomas H. Endieott, defendants therein, for the recovery of an unpaid balance in the sum of $5,855.48 on an account for attorney’s fees and expenses accruing under an express oral contract between the parties employing plaintiff in error, an attorney at law, to represent the defendants in business and legal matters for an indefinite time on a per diem expense and contingent mixed fee basis. A copy of the ledger account…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Life Ins. Co. v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Sharum v. SharumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Midland Valley R. Co. v. NeeleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Johnson v. RudisillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Terry v. GravittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Key Et Ux. v. British American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. ClappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Keller v. TracySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Lewis v. CouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API